Monday, September 21, 2009

Designers Accord

It's refreshes me to see people doing some pretty innovative things to promote sustainability with design.

I'm not an expert on this, but it seems pretty obvious that integrating sustainability principles into the different areas of design - at the level of consumption, or somewhere higher in the pipeline, like those of education or production - is no small task. But that's exactly what Designers Accord - an organization in the design community that is trying to "change the culture of the creative community from bottom to top, and with it, the way everything is made, from toothbrushes to airplanes" - is attempting, and from what I read, doing well.

The concept is simple enough: take the wide potential in design, and add an emphasis in sustainability to it. See what happens.

I'm not sure that these efforts will really change the way everything is made (maybe airplanes, don't know about the toothbrushes), but I like the spirit behind it. It seems predicated on the idea that social issues - climate change, social justice, civic improvement - aren't just confined to public or non-profit sectors, that there is a place for those emphases in the creative design, marketing, distribution, and consumption of products. Couldn't agree more.

There have already been some very cool advances; whether this continues into affordable, everyday products and services remains to be seen. But either way, the movement is one to watch.

An example:

Frog Design's lichen-based paint that changes colors with Carbon Monoxide exposure; a simple protective measure to prevent CO poisoning. Using biology to detect rising chemical levels? I like.

image from http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/valerie-casey/networked-culture/case-studies-sustainability-designers-accord-introduction

If you're interested, check out some designer accord case studies - spotlights on companies making waves in the field, hand-picked by fastcompany. check it out here: http://www.fastcompany.com/tag/designers-accord.

Saturday, September 19, 2009

Digital Friction

I recently read a great post by Seth Godin about what he called "friction."


Friction, as you might already know, is the force that opposes the movement of a body against another, or as Merriam Webster puts it, the "the force that resists relative motion between two bodies in contact."

Godin's friction is the force opposing the flow of ideas; it keeps ideas and movements from spreading to people and through populations. He gives the example of the friction associated with mailing something by snail mail: the cost of stamp and shipping. He then discusses how there is friction in e-mail also (no matter how free it seems to be). That friction, Godin maintains, is not the physical cost of sending the e-mail, but rather "the cost of all the people you'll lose."

His idea is that if you're reckless with your emailing, people will either be trained to ignore your emails and/or block your address. Worse yet, they might get annoyed enough to badmouth you to others (this would be added friction). He concludes with an operative example of how this kind of friction ruined the movement of Drugstore.com's ideas/products for him:

Drugstore.com made two mistakes with their relationship with me. First, they bought the lie that opt out is a productive strategy. They unilaterally decided that I'd be delighted to get regular emails from them, merely because I bought some shaving cream.


The second mistake? They didn't bother to be selective about what they sent.


I've never purchased diapers online, since my diaper purchases predate online diaper shopping. And my hope is that I won't be buying Depends for another fifty years or so. Drugstore.com should know this. And yet, because it's apparently free to email me, some lame brand manager says, "sure, do it!" Except then I unsubscribe and an asset that is worth ten or a hundred or a thousand dollars disappears, probably forever.


---------------------------------------------


I think this kind of friction pertains to most group work also. I'll use ministry as my example, although this could apply to student organizations, non-profit work, etc.


If you've ever led a small group or hc you know what I'm talking about. You know the feeling of emailing your group only to get little/no response, to your frustration. You might even re-email with reminders, in the hopes of getting a response. Then you might get one. Or you might not.


While I'm not saying that everyone fails to e-mail back because of this kind of idea friction, I am saying that it has a large part to do with many of these outcomes. Think about it - do you read every event, prayer meeting, donation, update, and church forward sitting in your mailbox, waiting to be opened?


If we're honest, we'd realize that at some point, we condition ourselves not to read the emails from high-volume e-mailers, from people who we know are going to bury us under paragraphs of dreary agenda and/or complicated prose. We could also become so annoyed that we start complaining to our friends about it, leaving the bad taste in their mouths also.


If we struggle with this as a reader, how can we expect anything different from our followers? I know from personal experience the disappointment that can arise when I send out encouragement, reminders, and meeting recap/agendas, and I can tell no one reads them. No one replies, and you wonder if your effort meant much at all.


So as a leader - and as a person who wants to spread ideas and encourage spiritual growth, interest in service work or passion for social justice - remember friction as you email. Choose wisely. Don't email everyone with everything, although in theory it should work. Not everyone is interested in everything, and in reality, most people are interested in less than you'd think. There are other ways - blogging, voluntary subscription to newsletters, in-person meetings - to update those who are interested in what's going on without being burned by the friction of people who really aren't.


I've learned to send directed emails, and to send short emails. I only send them to people who I really think would benefit from them. Yes, it's meant more thought on my part, more editing of the content, and a tough divorce from the idea of sending stuff out on huge email lists. The (wrong) instinct goes something like this: "Why not CC the whole group on this new update or idea? It's free, easy, I can just type their name in, and it's better that they have it than if they didn't."


The truth is that many times it's not better that they just have it, it's actually worse. So my best advice is to be thoughtful and as Godin suggests, recognize and "embrace the friction." The cost of not doing so is too far too high.


A link to Seth's "friction" post: http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2009/09/friction.html

Thursday, September 17, 2009

Home Grown

I recently went to Seattle to visit a friend, and I discovered that a good number of people grow their own vegetables in their yards/on their balconies. It's probably not enough to sustain most people, granted; its more a supplemental source of food.

But it got me thinking (and excited) about what I could grow on my balcony back in Houston. I did a little digging, and turns out that this horrendous Houston weather is - despite being so bad for so many reasons - good for something: growing vegetables, including my favorite, tomatoes. The humidity and sun make the environment great.

Roughly, here are the steps I need to take to get this done:

* decide if I will buy the feeder/bins for the plants, or if I'll build my own
* finalize the list of things I want to grow
* get smart about how to take care of those vegetables

I am open to ideas, or help, or even co-gardens if some of you want to "invest" a few dollars and share in the "profit."

More on this later.

Saturday, September 12, 2009

The Road Home

Charles straightened, stretching his back and letting out a brisk sigh. Craning his head upward, he rubbed his neck in deep circles. His memory of the last few days were like the mile markers streaking into dirty green across the windshield, blurred and patchy.


After the offer was made, he’d packed his things and gotten the rest of his business in order: Letters were written, gifts were bought; he had even remembered to change mailing addresses and cancel his classes. He’d even had a few meals with friends.


But on the road now, he didn’t know how to feel. Tinges of sadness and regret lingered; the imprints of hope and possibility too. There’d been pressure from parents, and from within, followed by waves of doubt and uncertainty. But their memories seemed to flutter over his mind only briefly, scattered quickly by the busyness. Perhaps he’d kept himself busy on purpose, to avoid his dense emotions. He couldn’t remember.


* * * * *


The hours passed, and Charles drove. His mind wandered slowly, from Houston to Los Angeles, and back. He remembered long roads like this, traveled with friends and broken only by forays into blue bonnet fields.



He wandered into memories of long, quiet streams - the soft trickling water, the steady sound of oars, the quiet conversations traded across canoes.



He startled at the memories of good jokes, of friends bent over in laughter, shaking so hard they couldn’t breathe.



Charles grinned softly at the memories, watching the people and events return slowly, one by one.







As the hours passed, Charles drove. Ahead, the sun was finishing its slow dive beneath the clouds. A distant windmill cut the dimming light into sprays of purple.


And as the light faded, Charles felt a small wave of anticipation well up within him. It came lightly, without warning or announcement; without defining moment or epiphany. It approached fragile and soft, like the purple rays draping the hills, moving as a light breeze against his heart.


Charles checked his mirrors and switched on his headlights. As another road sign approached, he swept his hair aside and squinted through his glasses. A wide smile spread across his face as he found the white letters, flashing brightly now against the fading light.


Houston: 326 miles.


Monday, September 7, 2009

Night Fishing

Recently, since I was on a break from med school, I went night fishing. And yes, it is done exactly like it sounds: you go out to the coast at 10-11 PM, chill in the dark with a spotlight, and fish all night. it should look something like this, maybe (see image).


Night Fishing, at its best.

To be honest, I had a few things going against me going into the night. First, and probably most importantly, I have never really stayed up all night by choice. There was that one time I had to stay up writing my BIOS 311/protein lab write up, but I'm pretty sure I ended up dozing and drooling on the fondren keyboard around 4:30 AM (see image, no drool visible). And it was definitely not by choice, so not sure if that counts.


My best attempt at an all-nighter.

Secondly, I am a mediocre fisherman at best. The last time I went out to fish with any intention of actually catching fish (as opposed to just getting a shiny "fishing" badge for my boy scout uniform) was probably in 6th grade. It was in a pond. I used a Mickey Mouse fishing pole. I don't remember catching anything.

But, a few of my friends are really into fishing - they go every few weeks - and I thought it would be fun to get into their inner workings and see what all the fuss was about. Here's what I learned:

1. fishing is easier than it seems, and harder than it seems.

I guess it depends on who you are - if you're me, then you can cast and re-cast, and get nothing. then when you do get a pull on your line, you can try to set your hook like a robot hyped up on caffeine, only to feel stupid for being duped by the waves. out of frustration, you might go to the other end of the spectrum and commit to waiting for stronger nibbles before setting the hook . . . and end up reeling in empty shrimp shells for an hour since you waited too long and lost all your bait to the fish.

But if you're my friend (hypothetically, let's just call you "sung"), you might go on ridiculous runs where you get bite after bite. if that's you, then the only thing that can stop you is another friend (we'll call him "louis") who pole jacks you mid-reel and gets all the fun. if that happens to you, you might end up joining me on the shore to chew sunflower seeds to have something - anything - to do.

so it depends.

2. the ocean is way more peaceful than I remember.

There is something immensely peaceful about the cadence of the waves, the way the steady tide energize as opposed to lulling to sleep. i can't say that it made me reflect on life and all that's good - because it didn't - but it definitely is different than sitting in front of a computer for 8 hrs. or even sitting in a forest for 8 hrs (and yes, I've done it before - but only to get a boy scout badge). Weirdly, I don't remember much time passing as I sat on the shore watching the waves . . . maybe they numbed my mind or something, but I don't remember thinking about or contemplating anything. There was me, and the water, and the sound of crashing waves. i liked it.

3. without the fish, fishing isn't fishing.

i've had people tell me that fishing isn't really about the fish, it's about going and hanging out with people, about the conversations, the atmosphere, the down time. and while that's true - there are elements of that - i don't buy it. fishing, and especially night fishing, is fun really only you catch fish. i'm no math whiz, but here's how the algorithm seems to work:

you catch a fish --> you have something to talk about --> you crack open a brew to celebrate --> you talk more --> repeat.

OR

you get a bite and almost catch a fish, but it breaks free --> you have something else to talk about --> you drink water --> you get ripped by the guys (more talking) --> you learn how to fish better --> hopefully you move up to the first algorithm.

really, it's about the fish.

4. i will probably suffer as a resident in whatever speciality i go into.

remember the whole "not being able to stay up all night" thing? yup, failed again. and the worst part was that as i was waking, i remember thinking how somewhere in some hospital, there was a lucky patient who didn't have to be seen by me in that condition.


morning along the coast.


All in all, night fishing was fun. but not all that fun because i didn't catch any fish. but fun in a sit-on-the-shore-and-forget-time-passed way, and fun in a beautiful-sun-rise-after-the-night kind of way. either way, i have more appreciation for the process of fishing, and for men who can stay up all night.

The Beginning

I've thought about starting a (semi) serious blog for some time now, and finally, years after my brief excursion into xanga, here it is.

From where I'm at, I don't have any expectations for this thing other than that it'll be a place where friends can catch up on what's going on with me and where I can post cool things I've read or learned recently.

With that, here goes nothing.